The laughable thing is that our Kentucky born moron born and inbred in some sort of family incestuous tryst can't again get his facts straight.
You're not even close to being my worst nightmare. Not even close and the truth is that I've defeated you on so many occasions with the various facts that I've presented. You're not even worthy of being a single cell organism much less a pimple on a cow's ass or a bacterial infection on one's own ass.
The funny thing is that instead of bringing up facts and figures, you brought up the racial angle because you didn't like the fact that your inbred countrymen of Kentucky are generally morons and bubbas of the highest order. People that basically if you gave them the letters "c" and "t" still could barely spell "cat" in many circumstances.
Not to mention you're obviously not worth anything at economic or statistical analysis much less anything else with that master's degree because you make less errors than most Kentucky 75 IQ morons, but you still make errors that someone with your level of education should be able to rectify with a little bit of reading and research.
First off, you had no clue about what a carpetbagger was or the term that has been in use for some 150 plus years dating back to the 1860s when it was used after the War Between the States (Kentucky Boy) aka Civil War. Carpetbagger was a term used to someone that moved to another state and ran a political campaign in order to win that campaign and live in a state with a political career while having no real connections to said state. If you were a master's degree candidate or recipient you should know that without looking it up before spouting off your pecker puffer.
The laughable thing is that bring up your IQ and your master's degree and the truth is that I've regularly been involved in IQ testing over the last 3 decades on occasion and not once did I go below 130 on the IQ scale. Not to mention my level of education is the same as your level of education but according to you, you can't even properly delineate facts and figures about a place where you have lived in the past. Which is immensely laughable because it appears that according to your ramble that you have no real knowledge of a place where you say that you lived. Yet the facts are that you couldn't even get your facts about said place correct.
For someone supposedly 55 years old and supposedly as traveled as you claim you would know better. One fact is that you had to bring up the racial issue which I never brought up until white trash like yourself decided to make an issue about it. Of course, instead of the issue being Kentucky and its lack of education even for its so called white pride citizenry, you made a racial issue out of it and of course instead of disputing what I really said which is far more correct than the obvious flaky methods you have used to argue your points. None of which will actually float in the real world of economic analysis because its obvious that you don't know what you are talking about.
For your information idiot that I've traveled to 46 states and spent time in most of them far more than anything you've ever done. Not to mention spent time in Canada, Europe, and Japan. Including years conducting business and personal relationships with people far flung as multitudes of countries across the world.
As far as your whine about hateful comments, I guess the truth hurts you pansy assed ultra sensitive Kentucky whiners too much because it hits very close to home and usually when people get immensely upset and worried about the commentary posted here, they act as if they don't have enough sense to support showing brain activity in their cranial cavities.
Much less the fact that you actually know what you are talking about in half of what you had to say with your 110-119 IQ which is quite above the average Kentuckian and even American yet still isn't at my level of 133 IQ tested about six months ago. Of course, Kentuckians can't stick to facts and figures about why their state is so pathetically shitty and has been for several generations going back at least 80 years if not all the way back to the Civil War ie. The War Between The States for the Southern twats that still think they are fighting for the Confederacy. Of which half of Kentuckians were Union soldiers while the other half supported the Confederacy.
Since you bring up the term "prejudice" that would infer that I was pre-judging a situation that was not something I had direct reason or personal experience regarding such. Which is even more funny because like most ignoramuses from Kentucky that whine using either some comment about racism or prejudice or hate, the facts are that what I have exhibited through facts and figures about Kentucky don't agree with your limited worldview and limited intelligence. Therefore it would be hate to tell the truth about the Bluegrass State and its generations of cultural inbreeding, criminality, ignorance, poverty, mass stupidity, economic issues, child abuse issues, and countless other socioeconomic statistics that piss all of you country fried bumpkins off because you know that its actually the truth that your state has been and always more than likely will be at the bottom of the pile when it comes to US states and the various aspects of American life.
Not once have you been able to ascertain the proper statistics and records that researched not only by the Federal Reserve, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Kentucky Government, and other well known and well researched documentation that can be found by opening your little browser and using your friend in Google or other search engines and methods to obtain said information.
Even proving more of your stupidity is that you bring up about Oregon lacking plentiful rain. Yes, you are partially correct in that the eastern half of the state doesn't get proper rain. The problem is that you didn't know the difference between the Western 1/3 of the state and that which resides East of the Cascades which makes up 2/3 of the state. Obviously you didn't live there very long nor had been there much if any ever to not notice the difference between the western 1/3 of Oregon which gets as much as 200 inches annually on western mountains in the Cascades and along the coast. The eastern part of Oregon (which you stated as somewhere you have lived and obviously haven't being the liar that you are gets as few as 5 inches in parts of the East.
In other words, you don't know what you are talking about again. I've been to Oregon, traveled in Oregon, read about Oregon since I was a kid some 40 plus years ago and probably have forgotten more about Oregon you learned in whatever pathetic attempt you attempted to pull to make yourself seem intelligent. You just blew it again like Kentuckians always do in that they blow off about things they have no clue about and here is your quote listed in the next paragraph.
"You are ignorant if you think Oregon gets plentiful rain like Kentucky, a large Mtn. range divides the state in half, the western side is virtually a semi-desert. (Yes I realize that doesn't weaken your basic premise, I'm just educating you, thank me in another's post LOL)"
Guess our resident dumbshit from Kentucky is the one that needs some good old fashioned reading, writing, arithmetic, social studies classes and a little bit of statistics and economic education.
Whoops, the western side of Oregon isn't desert at all but rather gets even 50 to 75 inches of rain along coastal areas which blows up your assertion that western side of the mountains are the desert area. A desert is usually confined to the fact that it gets at most maybe 10 to 15 inches of rain in any year. The western 1/3 of Oregon is not a desert as the Cascade Mountains which you mentioned nothing about and probably didn't even know the name proves that you didn't live in Oregon. More than likely, you opened up your beady little close together Kentucky eyes and decided that you could get into Wikipedia or some other place to find that information that proves you didn't know what you were talking about.
If you had lived in Oregon you would have noticed the wide disparity between the climatology of the western 1/3 up to the edge of the Cascade Mountains which run from British Columbia to Northern California for your education of which you received in Kentucky somewhere in the boondocks where they barely could read and behaved like illiterate hillbillies.
Interestingly, you couldn't even get that basic fact right about Oregon which says to me that you've never been there much less lived there nor the only thing you could pull out of your uneducated Kentuckian ass was that the desert is on the western side of the state and the rainfall is on the east. Which obviously isn't the case as evidenced by this Wikipedia intro in parentheses below
"Oregon's climate is generally mild. West of the Cascade Mountains, winters are chilly with frequent rain, while light snowfall occurs a few days a year; temperatures can get very cold, but only occasionally, as the result of Arctic cold waves. The high desert region of the state is much drier, with less rain, more snow, colder winters, and hotter summers. An oceanic climate (also called "marine west coast climate") predominates in Western Oregon, and a much drier semi-arid climate prevails east of the Cascade Range in Eastern Oregon. Major factors determining Oregon's climate include the large semi-permanent high pressure and low pressure systems of the north Pacific Ocean, the continental air masses of North America, and the Cascade mountains.[1] Oregon's population centers, which lie mostly in the western part of the state, are generally moist and mild, while the lightly populated high deserts of Central and Eastern Oregon are much drier."
Now for clarification, if you knew that and lived in Oregon you would have known that the eastern 2/3 of the state was semi arid to dealing with desertification. Of course, Uncle Cletus and the rest of your clan in Boondock, Kentucky couldn't be bothered with social studies and learning about different places. Which I've already figured out that you're more than likely another Kentucky based boob just trying to appear intelligent. You've been exposed as a total fraud and a total moron because you've claimed in your own post to have been a resident of Oregon along with California for a little while. Along with your stints in Northern Indiana and Southern Indiana. If our little Kentucky boy knew anything he would have already known about a state he supposedly lived in.
Let's also bring up the term of racism WHICH by definition is "prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior"
Which in what I have said and espoused has nothing to do with superiority of a different race since its quite obvious that I am a white male and probably more white than most Kentuckians in that there was little racial mixing in my family background since I've traced it to New Jersey in 1664 and formerly from the Netherlands before that. If I'm white and I critique morons of my own race who are also white that would mean that I'm not in the slightest practicing racial superiority nor prejudice against my own racial characteristics as well as others of my own race.
Its too bad that most morons like yourself can only get all worked up about issues of racial matters because you have nothing else to hang your hat onto that actually is beneficial to your sustenance and self improvement. All the while all of you racist fools will criticize higher achievement black people with all kinds of racial pejoratives against those of other races. Which in fact, does prove that you are racist against others of not your skin type and color. Which in essence is the bane of stupidity that exists in Kentucky and even much of America that racist morons most of whom have lower IQ levels don't even realize that their family trees are not even racially pure with all of the mixed marriages that existed between colonists and Indians over the 400 years of human settlement in North America. Even funnier is that you'll be the first people to bring up the race card or your supposed racial superiority despite the fact that more often than not, your own forefathers were sliding up to the slave shacks in the South and getting some black slave pregnant or fathering mixed race children despite the cultural taboos of Southern culture of that time.
All the while like Strom Thurmond, who was a state's rights secession candidate for President of the United States in 1948 and a Senator from South Carolina from 1954 to 2002 who was constantly against civil rights legislation for black folks and others oppressed by Jim Crow laws, voting restrictions, lynchings, mob violence, and other criminality of whites in the South against blacks. Yet Strom Thurmond, in his greatest hypocrisy 30 years before his ranting about civil rights and state secession, was the father of a black young lady that later became a teacher. So all the while he spent years preaching against civil rights and states rights to treat blacks as lesser humans, he was dipping his flaccid penis into the vagina of a young black housekeeper that was 16 years old at the time.
All the while in segregationist South Carolina he was ranting about pro segregation policies and against equality for black citizens of the southern states as well as the United States during the 1950s and 1960s. All at the same time he had a black daughter born out of wedlock to a 16 year old girl who was a house servant for his family. Talk about hypocrisy and bigotry.
Obviously, since I'm not advocating racial superiority of any race or as such means that I'm not being racist when I call out the white trash of society in places like Kentucky who ironically share much in common with poor blacks in inner cities than they would ever imagine. Especially when it comes to economic lack of empowerment, lack of education, and lack of all kinds of factors that would make them successful.
In 2016, Kentucky's median household income for residents was 41,576 while that of black Americans median household income was 43,300 which both of which were respectively 17,463 and 15,739 dollars below that of the US median household income of 59,039. So in essence Kentuckians have more in common economically with black Americans than they do with the rest of the overall American population.
The laughable facts are that even Oregon with a per capita GDP 12,000 dollars more than Kentucky along with Kansas are vastly superior states to Kentucky and this despite the fact that Kentucky receives on average 40 to 50 inches of rainfall in almost the entire state mostly during the growing season from April to September. While Oregon receives that much on average in Portland and western half of the state if not more. Yet the eastern part is lacking that sort of weather for agricultural output. All the while Kansas and Iowa continue to prove that smaller agricultural states can be successful states where as Kentucky with more people cannot despite much better climatology than either of those states.
Of course now you don't care about Japan but you've totally missed the point that Japan was able to have a relatively high standard of living with little land, no real resources, and everything raw material related had to be imported. Yet Kentucky has vast amounts of coal and agricultural products yet remains an economic basketcase in the Ohio Valley. To the point that Kentucky is one of the worst 4 or 5 states in the Union year over year and has been for decades and probably always will be such. Even to the point where your most major city lags other regional cities in economic performance, job creation, income and all of these facts are evident.
While you have a huge hard on trying to attempt to say that Japan doesn't matter, its still far above Kentucky while Kentucky has a good amount of resources such as coal, marketable timber, etc. All the while Kentucky is riddled with prescription drug abuse, meth heads, heroin addicts, and a white trash culture second to none. Not to mention states like Oregon, Iowa, Kansas, and even the states around you other than West Virginia and Arkansas beat you by several thousand to fifteen thousand dollars in per capita GDP as well as per capita income.
The fact is that Kentucky has a larger population than Iowa yet Kentucky is dirt poor. Just in case you failed at social studies and economic analysis usually the larger a state is in population means that it does better economically because it has more to work with and more economic trade and production. Not so with Kentucky despite the fact that Kentucky has three relatively large metro areas in Lexington, Louisville, and Northern Kentucky with 250,000 plus in population. Yet Kentucky is still lacks the fact that its 11,000 dollars behind Iowa in per capita GDP.
Kentucky is a failure economically as well as educationally and the statistics prove that Kentucky is a failure and even the past couple of governors including your current one knows that the state is a failure which is why if Kentuckians have a future, it will have to be with creation and economic development and pulling KY schools out of the basement dweller status that you've so succinctly shown with your lack of understanding.
I'm glad people like you think I'm an asshole. So its now Mr. Asshole to you because as has been evidence I've thoroughly disemboweled the arguments that you've tried to make in order to try to make the Commonwealth of Dunces to look slightly more palatable to anyone outside of the state that actually reads this. So you can call me Mr. Asshole since calling me a carpetbagger was beyond your own reading comprehension level that you so vehemently tried to show. All of which you failed at much like your Kentucky education and your so called life experience in Oregon. Hilarious really, I'm going to laugh all day about that one and even with my post Christmas family get together and dinner. Again proving what kind of bullshit that you'll attempt as a Kentuckian just to pass off the fact that you pretend to be intelligent.
Maybe you can run back down to the hills and hollers with your Kentucky based education and pork your pig or more than likely your own family members because if its good enough for you, then its good enough for the whole family to join in.
Kind of like one of your Kentucky country cousins that last night wrote me rambling that Louisville was great when in fact they didn't even know the meaning of the word "derision" which was hilarious because they're also evidencing that they are too stupid to look up what the word meant which is some more of the cultural stupidity and ignorance that Kentuckians regularly exhibit.
Kind of like the fact that you didn't even know that Oregon was was 2/3 arid in the east and 1/3 wet in the west despite having lived there.
Touche to you being the Kentucky Fried Idiot
